Recent Posts

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 ... 10
31
Adventures / Re: Year 488 - War on the Continent
« Last post by Geoffrey on July 31, 2019, 11:30:19 AM »
In general, Geoffrey was fairly indifferent on whether the knifers survived or not but this campaign had just begun, and men lost today would mean a more difficult battle tomorrow.

"If the foot soldiers took up defensive positions after engaging them, that would increase their chances of survival and delay the enemy forces long enough for us to flank them."
32
Game Discussion / Re: Year 488 Summer campaign
« Last post by GM Craig on July 25, 2019, 06:39:04 PM »
You could do the frontal attack, but send a force of knights to flank. Charging knights would greatly disrupt their lines, but the mission would be very risky for the knights themselves. Great opportunity for glory, so high-risk, high-reward.
33
Game Discussion / Re: Year 488 Summer campaign
« Last post by Artaigne on July 24, 2019, 09:17:54 AM »
A frontal attack sounds good, so long as we don't chase them into a trap.
34
Game Discussion / Re: Year 488 Summer campaign
« Last post by Arne on July 23, 2019, 08:14:51 AM »
Not bad.  If we give them an escape route, though, they might withdraw or run after the first few exchanges.  We wouldn't wipe them out in one fell swoop that way, but we'd take less casualties and hopefully still force them to be herded and at a disadvantage. 

The disadvantage to the herding tactic, though, is that they know the land better than us, so they could (with some good rolls from their commander) lure us into some crappy terrain where they gain the advantage, or sucker us to a place where another Frankish force could be close by.

That being said, I'm leaning toward smashing them here and now so we won't have to worry about them later on.
35
Game Discussion / Re: Year 488 Summer campaign
« Last post by Cedwyn on July 22, 2019, 05:20:58 PM »
Soooo...I’m on the fence. My gut says we should attack from the front since we have numerical advantage. No need for fancy measures here just go for the jugular. That feels right for Cedwyn.

Thoughts?
36
Adventures / Re: Year 488 - War on the Continent
« Last post by Arne on July 19, 2019, 10:25:44 PM »
Arne thought about the knight's plan and the terrain for a few moments, then spoke up.  "We could crush the enemy here and now if the knifers' courage holds and our timing is good.  We have more warriors than the Franks have.  Their courage and discipline will be important here, though.  Cut them off, and they could fight with the ferocity of cornered wolves - or they could break."
37
Adventures / Re: Year 488 - War on the Continent
« Last post by GM Craig on July 18, 2019, 10:08:10 PM »
Your troops should be able to hold against them, provided the knifers hold up, at least long enough for the other forces to get into position. However, if you kept the flankers to just knights, you could do a lot more damage, and have a much larger element of surprise. Troops marching on their flank would give the enemy commander a chance to pivot before his forces were engaged, though he's be in a much less advantageous position. The centre of the valley would become a killing ground, likely for both sides, but you have the numbers to overwhelm them. Also, if you did force a pivot, they would have a much harder time escaping, and would therefore be more likely to break.

In summary, troops marching likely means more casualties, but has good odds of producing a significant victor, possibly destroying the enemy force entirely. Knights on the flank would be safer (for the foot soldiers, not necessarily the knights), so fewer casualties, but the enemy would be more likely to escape.

That's the tactical analysis of the chosen overall tactic. There's also a standard battle array - it would be a quick fight, and you're pretty certain you could force the enemy to withdraw without much effort. If you get lucky, they could even break, but you casualties would be lower.
38
Adventures / Re: Year 488 - War on the Continent
« Last post by Cedwyn on July 17, 2019, 09:34:56 AM »
Cedwyn shook his head at Arne. The knight was less than happy with his financial situation and the Thulian made a legitimate request. Cedwyn would hopefully remedy the situation in the next summer but for now, it was not to be.

"Unfortunately not, Good Arne. We lack the available coin to pay a chirurgeon and must make do as we may. With the main host, it is possible to get aid but not here on the march."

He turned to Sir Geoffrey, "Six lords and they number fewer than our 200 but they are fixed in place. We must confront them as they will harrass us regardless of a new route. I'm of a mind to split off part of our force and march ahead with just my men and the Irishmen. Geoffrey, Arne, and Valka...you would then come-amarching up on their flank as they have committed to engaging us."

"Your thoughts?"

[OOC: Craig...tell me about the tactical considerations that Cedwyn would know but I don't]
39
Adventures / Re: Year 488 - War on the Continent
« Last post by Geoffrey on June 20, 2019, 09:44:22 AM »
"Sir Cedwyn." the knight began.

"The Franks await us below the line of a hill.  My guess would be they plan to catch us while on the move and before we can form ranks to defend ourselves.  There were six banners on display and they number about one hundred, however they are fairly well armed and armored.  Our hired Irish will likely not stand up well against them.

Unfortunately I was not able to locate their camp or another route around them before we were spotted and attacked by a patrol.  One of the patrol was able to flee so we were forced to end our reconnaissance and return."
40
Game Discussion / Re: Year 488 Summer campaign
« Last post by Valka on June 19, 2019, 02:35:06 PM »
He turned next to the senior knight.  "Sir Cedwyn, do we have any læknar . . ."  he shook his head irritably and fought to remember the Cymric word, ". . . chir-urgeons with our host that could tend to Gunnolf?"

And how much does it cost  :-\
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 ... 10